One of the frustrating things about much of the early commentary around the Iran war was how it framed the relationship between military force and political objectives.
Deep analysis, but I think it gives the Iranian regime too much credit. Its survival is not proof of strategic genius. It is a mix of repression, fanaticism, corruption, and Europe’s repeated failure to support the Americans and Israelis when they try to stop it.
I wouldn't call it strategic genius, just a keen awareness of their trump card and a willingness to play it - the sort of thing others should have noted too. No amount of European support could have altered this fundamental reality.
One thing that is genuinely impressive is the way the Iranians decentralized their C2 in anticipation of decapitation strikes. Fanaticism, yes, but intelligently applied.
Deep analysis, but I think it gives the Iranian regime too much credit. Its survival is not proof of strategic genius. It is a mix of repression, fanaticism, corruption, and Europe’s repeated failure to support the Americans and Israelis when they try to stop it.
I wouldn't call it strategic genius, just a keen awareness of their trump card and a willingness to play it - the sort of thing others should have noted too. No amount of European support could have altered this fundamental reality.
One thing that is genuinely impressive is the way the Iranians decentralized their C2 in anticipation of decapitation strikes. Fanaticism, yes, but intelligently applied.