Part 1 outlined the development of the air-mechanized concept, which was born in the 1970s and took off in the 80s. At its inception, it held the promise of striking decisive blows in the enemy’s depth, giving it a critical role in the high-tempo mechanized warfare that was envisioned for the future. Yet the concept never really took off. Moving sufficient combat power which could survive enemy counterattacks proved challenging. Critics
"This is likely only possible in truly inaccessible areas such as mountain ranges." Shouldn't we start thinking of urban areas like mountain ranges as it concerns accessibility?
"This is likely only possible in truly inaccessible areas such as mountain ranges." Shouldn't we start thinking of urban areas like mountain ranges as it concerns accessibility?
I can already see the white papers on the strategic consequences of sprawl.